top of page

BSA Section 29 to 40, Section 30,31,32,33,34,25,26,37,38,39 BSA Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare act

Section 29 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy of entry in public record or an electronic record made in performance of duty.


An entry in any public or other official book, register or record or an electronic record, stating a fact in issue or relevant fact, and made by a public servant in the discharge of his official duty, or by any other person in performance of a duty specially enjoined by the law of the country in which such book, register or record or an electronic record, is kept, is itself a relevant fact.


Section 30 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans.


Statements of facts in issue or relevant facts, made in published maps or charts generally offered for public sale, or in maps or plans made under the authority of the Central Government or any State Government, as to matters usually represented or stated in such maps, charts or plans, are themselves relevant facts.


Section 31 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy of statement as to fact of public nature contained in certain Acts or notifications.


When the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any fact of a public nature, any statement of it, made in a recital contained in any Central Act or State Act or in a Central Government or State Government notification appearing in the respective Official Gazette or in any printed paper or in electronic or digital form purporting to be such Gazette, is a relevant fact.


Section 32 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law books including electronic or digital form.


When the Court has to form an opinion as to a law of any country, any statement of such law contained in a book purporting to be printed or published including in electronic or digital form under the authority of the Government of such country and to contain any such law, and any report of a ruling of the Courts of such country contained in a book including in electronic or digital form purporting to be a report of such rulings, is relevant.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


Section 33 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers.


When any statement of which evidence is given forms part of a longer statement, or of a conversation or part of an isolated document, or is contained in a document which forms part of a book, or is contained in part of electronic record or of a connected series of letters or papers, evidence shall be given of so much and no more of the statement, conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers as the Court considers necessary in that particular case to the full understanding of the nature and effect of the statement, and of the circumstances under which it was made.


Section 34 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.


The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.


Section 35 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, etc., jurisdiction.


(1) A final judgment, order or decree of a competent Court or Tribunal, in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction, which confers upon or takes away from any person any legal character, or which declares any person to be entitled to any such character, or to be entitled to any specific thing, not as against any specified person but absolutely, is relevant when the existence of any such legal character, or the title of any such person to any such thing, is relevant.


(2) Such judgment, order or decree is conclusive proof that—

(i) any legal character, which it confers accrued at the time when such judgment,

order or decree came into operation;


(ii) any legal character, to which it declares any such person to be entitled, accrued to that person at the time when such judgment, order or decree declares it to have accrued to that person;


(iii) any legal character which it takes away from any such person ceased at the time from which such judgment, order or decree declared that it had ceased or should cease; and


(iv) anything to which it declares any person to be so entitled was the property of that person at the time from which such judgment, order or decree declares that it had been or should be his property.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


Section 36 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35.


Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 35 are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry; but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state.


Illustration.


A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the land, which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land, in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists.


Section 37 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 when relevant.


Judgments or orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36, are irrelevant, unless the existence of such judgment, order or decree is a fact in issue, or is relevant under some other provision of this Adhiniyam.


Illustrations.


(a) A and B separately sue C for a libel which reflects upon each of them. C in each 5 case says that the matter alleged to be libellous is true, and the circumstances are such that it is probably true in each case, or in neither. A obtains a decree against C for damages on the ground that C failed to make out his justification. The fact is irrelevant as between B and C.


(b) A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is irrelevant.


(c) A has obtained a decree for the possession of land against B. C, B's son, murders A in consequence. The existence of the judgment is relevant, as showing motive for a crime.


(d) A is charged with theft and with having been previously convicted of theft. The previous conviction is relevant as a fact in issue.


(e) A is tried for the murder of B. The fact that B prosecuted A for libel and that A was convicted and sentenced is relevant under section 6 as showing the motive for the fact in issue.


Section 38 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be prove


Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 34, 35 or 36, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.


Section 39 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Opinions of experts.


(1) When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science or art, or any other field, or as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, or any other field, or in questions as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant facts and such persons are called experts.


Illustrations.


(a) The question is, whether the death of A was caused by poison. The opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by the poison by which A is supposed to have died, are relevant.


(b) The question is, whether A, at the time of doing a certain act, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he was doing what was either wrong or contrary to law. The opinions of experts upon the question whether the symptoms exhibited by A commonly show unsoundness of mind, and whether such unsoundness of mind usually renders persons incapable of knowing the nature of the acts which they do, or of knowing that what they do is either wrong or contrary to law, are relevant.


(c) The question is, whether a certain document was written by A. Another document is produced which is proved or admitted to have been written by A. The opinions of experts on the question whether the two documents were written by the same person or by different persons, are relevant.


(2) When in a proceeding, the court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to any information transmitted or stored in any computer resource or any other electronic or digital form, the opinion of the Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, is a relevant fact.


Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence shall be an expert.


Section 40 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Facts bearing upon opinions of experts.


Facts, not otherwise relevant, are relevant if they support or are inconsistent with the opinions of experts, when such opinions are relevant.


Illustrations.


(a) The question is, whether A was poisoned by a certain poison. The fact that other persons, who were poisoned by that poison, exhibited certain symptoms which experts affirm or deny to be the symptoms of that poison, is relevant.


(b) The question is, whether an obstruction to a harbour is caused by a certain sea-wall. The fact that other harbours similarly situated in other respects, but where there were no such sea-walls, began to be obstructed at about the same time, is relevant.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


to read the next batch of section of BSA


Tap


BSA Section 29 to 40, Section 30,31,32,33,34,25,26,37,38,39 BSA Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare act





Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page